Editorial policy

Open Tennis Review aims to explain tennis clearly and fairly. We distinguish general explanation from opinion, check factual details before publication and make changes openly when something needs correcting.

Accuracy and clarity

Articles are written to answer a defined question in plain English. We check claims against suitable reference material and avoid presenting an uncertain detail as settled. Rules and formats can change, so when a detail may depend on the governing context, we say so rather than implying one explanation covers every situation.

Independence

Editorial choices are made for reader relevance and clarity. A commercial relationship does not buy favourable coverage, and partners do not control editorial conclusions. We do not present personal opinions as official rules or professional instruction.

Corrections

If you spot an error or unclear explanation, use the Contact page and identify the article and the point at issue. We review correction requests and amend material when warranted, making the change clear to readers where appropriate.

Partnerships and illustrations

Material created with a partner is labelled so readers can distinguish it from independent editorial work. Some illustrations may be generated with AI; where used, they are illustrative rather than documentary and are identified accordingly.